The American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) recently upheld its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, rejecting a proposal to discontinue these efforts. The decision, welcomed by Black dermatologists and others, maintains the AAD’s focus on promoting diversity within the field.
The controversy began in February when a group of AAD members proposed ending all DEI programs, claiming they were more harmful than beneficial. This sparked a significant reaction, with many opposing the resolution as an attempt to undermine essential initiatives for diversity and inclusion.
Following testimonies from dermatologists of various backgrounds, the AAD’s advisory board not only voted against the proposal but also chose to expand the academy’s mission to further prioritize diversity. They emphasized their commitment to combatting discrimination, including antisemitism, Islamophobia, anti-Asian hate, and racism.
The disputed resolution was introduced by Dr. Brian Raphael, who later clarified that his intent was to promote an even more inclusive policy. However, his proposal faced backlash from many in the dermatology community.
In response to the initial resolution, dermatologists Dr. Wendy Roberts, Dr. Jeanine Downie, and Dr. Heidi Waldorf submitted a counter-resolution to reinforce the AAD’s DEI initiatives. This action, coupled with a petition that garnered over 6,000 signatures, helped rally support for maintaining and expanding DEI programs.
The debate reflects broader societal tensions regarding DEI, with conservative figures in various industries opposing such initiatives. The AAD’s decision to continue these programs signifies an acknowledgment of the importance of diversity and inclusion in healthcare and the ongoing need to address disparities within the field.